Both reciprocity without ceremonialism and ceremonialism
Ceremonialism is present when food and/or chattels are reciprocated; e.g., the recipient returns food and/or chattels to the original donor in a particular way at an appropriate time
No reciprocity
Reciprocity, but no ceremonialism of any sort

Both 2 and 3
Both 2 and 4
No redistribution of food and/or chattels
Redistribution in which there is ceremonialism and in which recipients of food and/or chattels are treated about equally
Redistribution in which there is no ceremonialism of any sort and in which recipients of food and/or chattels are treated about equally
Redistribution in which there is some ceremonialism and in which recipients receive food and/or chattels differentially; e.g., nonkin receive more than kin or vice versa, the people of highest rank receive more than those of lowest rank, the people with the greatest prestige are the first to receive gifts, and so forth
Redistribution with ceremony in which the donor provides food for the ceremony, and all who attend receive about equal shares regardless of differences in status, rank, or kinship

Both 3 and 4
No ceremonialism or etiquette is involved in exploiting food resources or using chattels recognized as belonging to others
No intracommunity use of privately owned food resources and/or chattels permitted; therefore no ceremonialism
No or few privately owned food resources and/or chattels
Some ceremonialism or etiquette is involved in gaining access to the food resources or the use of chattels recognized as belonging to others; e.g., invitations are extended, use is requested, affines are expected to use the resources and/or chattels, and so forth

Both 2 and 3 obtain, neither clearly predominates
Both 3 and 4 obtain, none clearly predominates
Food and/or chattels are predominantly distributed on a balanced or equal basis, i.e., donors and recipients reverse roles on a fairly equal basis and contribute and receive food and/or chattels more or less equally
Food and/or chattels are predominantly distributed on a generalized basis, i.e., people in the local group possess or have access to much more food and/or many more chattels than people in another local group. A pattern obtains where the possessors of plenty are generalized donors and those who possess less are generalized recipients. The recipients do not reciprocate to the donors in amount
Food and/or chattels are predominantly distributed on a negative basis, i.e., people in the local group possess or have access to much more food and/or many more chattels than people in other local groups. A pattern obtains where the possessors of plenty provide for the needy as the exigencies dictate; but the needy recipients, in turn, pay back as negative donors a greater quantity of food and/or chattels to the original donor than they received (The return payment may be deferred for a season or more
Negative reciprocity (as in #4) in which the local group is the negative recipient of food and/or chattels from a group that possesses plenty (or from several groups), rather than being the possessors and donors of plenty themselves
There is no reciprocity between or among extralocal groups