No reliability score (see Variable 1651 in 78.REL for reasons)
The different coders agree perfectly (including the situation when they both said dont know)
One coder says dont know or not applicable and the other two coders would have received a reliability score of 1, 2, or 3 if they had been the only raters
One coder says dont know, and the other said not applicable
One of the two or three raters says dont know or not applicable, and the second one (if only two raters) assigned a score of 1-3 to the case; if there are three raters, the other two do not meet the reliability conditions of reliability scores 4

Low threat of famine in the 25-year time period - food is reported to be ample or adequate, with no report of famine; or famine occurred only in the past; or occasional periods of food shortage are reported, but the scare foods are reported to be replaced by other available foods; or there may be chronic hunger in the absence of the conditions immediately below (original scores 2-4) (original code 1)
original code 1.5
Moderate threat of famine - there is no reported famine during the 25-year time period, but the ethnographer states that there is an ever present threat of famine (original code 2)
Moderately high threat of famine - one famine occurred during the 25-year time period (original code 3)
original code 3.5
High - more than one famine occurred during the 25-year time period (original code 4)

Low threat of severe natural disrupters of the food supply
Moderate threat of severe natural disrupters of food supply
Moderately high threat of severe natural disrupters of food supply
High

Low or rare (original code 1)
original code 1.5
There are some hungry times during the year when people complain that they do not have enough food or enough of a particular food (original code 2)
Some members of the population usually do not have enough to eat (original code 3)
Most members of the population usually do not have enough to eat - i.e., they are chronically undernourished (original code 4)